|
Author
|
Topic: Timing Belt
|
edmode Junior Member
|
posted 03-02-2004 03:14 AM
I have a 2001 GTI 1.8T and I hate it. It has been nothing but problems since I bought it new on 10/00. Most recently, at 102,000 miles my timing belt broke. 2k outside of warranty VW will not be covering the $3,500 worth of damage. Why did the belt break 2k miles out for warranty? Why does VW suggest the belt be changed at 105k? I wish there was something I could do about this... any suggestions?IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-02-2004 07:17 AM
I would fight this. If you have done all required maintenance and had not reached the maintenance interval and the thing fails, VW CANNOT claim lack of maintiance. Get on the horn to VW customer care (if you haven't already), and tell them you need them to stand behind their products or it will be ANOTHER lawsuit for them! 100k powertrain warranty, 105k timing belt...looks like a revenue generator to me. Just like the 12/12 basic warranty and 15k rear brake pads w/o wear indicators! IP: Logged |
LF Member
|
posted 03-02-2004 03:15 PM
Not to be rude but who in their right mind thinks that a timing belt is going to last 100k i change mine every 60k!! Just so I don't have this kind of problem...IP: Logged |
VWTech8176 Member
|
posted 03-02-2004 08:40 PM
Thank you LF I was about to post the same thing. It would have been far less expensive for you to do a little preventive maintenance on your own and replace the thing at 60K or 80K to AVOID a problem, thus the term, preventive maintenance. I don't care what a manufacturer tells you, I wouldn't leave a timing belt on ANY car for 100K, ESPECIALLY if the vehicle will be out of warranty by then. This is just plain stupidity and now you will pay big time for it. I betcha next time you'll make sure that belt gets changed. Of course that's after you blame vw for their "defective" product that lasted 102K miles. When I worked for Saturn, they claim a 100K miles t-Belt change and I coudln't beleive it...but I also said I would start recommending them long before that so as to avoid coistly repairs for the customer down the line. Of course, then I'm just some dirtbag mechanic trying to get over on an unknowing customer since "it says it will last 100K" Bull IP: Logged |
edmode Junior Member
|
posted 03-02-2004 09:42 PM
I know absolutely nothing about cars (read "reasonable and prudent consumer") and was trusting in the publication set forth by the manufacturer. As a matter of fact, VW sales touts the delay in maintenance (longer intervals between timing belts, oil changes, "tune ups") as a major benefit of owning a VW. The service counselor at VW stated he has repaired a number of Jettas and GTIs with this same damage with about the same mileage, just outside of warranty. Sounds suspicious to me. Why would VW state the timing belt needs to be replaced at 105k miles if, not uncommonly, the timing belt breaks shy of 105k miles? Sounds suspicious to me. Live and learn, but next time I am able to purchase a new vehicle, you can bet it will not be a VW or any other car with an "Interference" type timing belt driven engine. IP: Logged |
VWTech8176 Member
|
posted 03-02-2004 10:14 PM
Well I knew that was coming....good luck finding a car made today that doesn't have an interference engine driven by a timing belt. It's not rocket science, just common sense that a rubber belt is NOT going to last 100K miles. So rather than being a smart and responsible consumer that will perform preventive maintenance to otheir vehicle, you're gonna find one that you won't have to, so you can neglect it forver with no ill effects. Good LuckIP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-03-2004 07:13 AM
quote:
Thank you LF I was about to post the same thing.
...but my other personality "LF" was on my computer. edmode, Don't worry about those other two jerks, they have issues beyond turning wrenches for a living. What has VW Customer Care (1.800.822.8987) said about you following the maintaince scheduele, but experiancing a failure? IP: Logged |
VWTech8176 Member
|
posted 03-03-2004 08:20 AM
Are you actually retarded UTR??? I tell you what, I am going to do you a favor and MAKE you a smarter person. Even though you are an unbeleiveable dick, I am going to do you this favor...I will correct ALL of your spelling and grammatical errors from now on. Then at least those of us that are literate will be able to read your bullshit more clearly....lets start now shall we? ............................................. What has VW Customer Care (1.800.822.8987) said about you following the maintaince scheduele, but experiancing a failure? ............................................. M-A-I-N-T-E-N-A-N-C-EE-X-P-E-R-I-E-N-C-I-N-G Tomorrow's word boys and girls will be douchebag...that D-O-U-C-H-E-B-A-G...but I am sure UTR that you already know how to spell that. The MAINTENANCE (see I can even use it in a sentence for you) schedule doesn't mean dick when the warranty is voided....regardless of what they SAY it will last....if they tell you it would last 250K miles, but the warranty ends at 100K, who is taking the risk here? Not VW, they aren't saying the belt is WARRANTIED for 250K, they are saying it SHOULD, MAYBE will last that long. Why would you chance it?? IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-03-2004 10:36 AM
Thanks Tech!Hey, while you are at it, please inform the world of the timing belt change interval for a 2001 1.8T. That’s what I thought. Why 'chance it'? Because the owner’s manual is brought up, by dealers, time and time again regarding proper car care. Does the PD REALLY need 505.01 oil, or is that just a strong suggestion as to what MIGHT work? So, the owner’s manual doesn’t mean squat? Really, please, make me a smarter person. I guess I have had it wrong all along!
IP: Logged |
LF Member
|
posted 03-03-2004 11:58 AM
UTR if you want way not try 205k on you belt.I'm sure your wallet is big enough to pay for your stupidity!!!!IP: Logged |
wack_monkey Member
|
posted 03-04-2004 10:31 AM
up the river, we cant make u smarter, but we sure can have fun trying. hahaha but i dont think its gonna work. maybe we should call u "up duh river" have a nice day  ------------------ here comes the fiesta!!! IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-04-2004 10:51 AM
Hey class,Check this out: http://www.vw.com/SP/SchedMaint.html 2001 golf 1.8T has a 105k-mile timing belt. I guess VW is crap, if their car cannot meet the OFFICIAL 'factory' recommended service intervals. Crappy parts Crappy cars Crappy service It’s all right there in black and white on the official VWoA website, which corresponds directly with the owner’s manual. Again, please explain how these facts are fraud?
IP: Logged |
Jiblets Member
|
posted 03-07-2004 10:13 PM
Well unless their was a recall i dont think there is too much you can doo to VW. You are over the Warranty, they are very anal about warranties thats why its there. so in the course of owner ship if it messes up after the warranty becomes null and void then its your problem. Also you should never believe what the box says for a guarantee because the results they give are either estimates or if you drive like a grand mother. There is a quote that will help this matter out Chris farley once said in the move Tommy Boy " I can take a shit in a box and mark it guaranteed but then all you'll have is a guaranteed pile of shit."and a timing belt for 3 and a half grand where are you buying your timing belts? IP: Logged |
Jiblets Member
|
posted 03-07-2004 10:17 PM
And also i would have steered clear form most Volkswagens, i mean they are one of the best if not the best car company out there. But i would have gone with one of their off shoot companies like Skoda or Audi. VW just isnt cutting it anymore.IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-08-2004 06:31 AM
quote:
and a timing belt for 3 and a half grand where are you buying your timing belts?
Uh, I thing the t-belt that was spec'd for 105k miles snapped at 102k. Being an interference engine, the head got trashed = $3000. IP: Logged |
Jiblets Member
|
posted 03-08-2004 07:27 AM
So there was some engine damage?IP: Logged |
Jiblets Member
|
posted 03-08-2004 04:35 PM
I was wondering what was the 3500 dollars in damage. And how was it done? were you driving the car with the timing belt broken, did it smash stuff when it broke?IP: Logged |
7kardawg7 Member
|
posted 03-08-2004 06:43 PM
quote: Originally posted by VWTech8176: Are you actually retarded UTR??? I tell you what, I am going to do you a favor and MAKE you a smarter person. Even though you are an unbeleiveable dick, I am going to do you this favor...I will correct ALL of your spelling and grammatical errors from now on. Then at least those of us that are literate will be able to read your bullshit more clearly....lets start now shall we? ............................................. What has VW Customer Care (1.800.822.8987) said about you following the maintaince scheduele, but experiancing a failure? ............................................. M-A-I-N-T-E-N-A-N-C-EE-X-P-E-R-I-E-N-C-I-N-G Tomorrow's word boys and girls will be douchebag...that D-O-U-C-H-E-B-A-G...but I am sure UTR that you already know how to spell that. The MAINTENANCE (see I can even use it in a sentence for you) schedule doesn't mean dick when the warranty is voided....regardless of what they SAY it will last....if they tell you it would last 250K miles, but the warranty ends at 100K, who is taking the risk here? Not VW, they aren't saying the belt is WARRANTIED for 250K, they are saying it SHOULD, MAYBE will last that long. Why would you chance it??
U R an idiot. WHAT IS UP WITH THE SPELLING TEST? this is a forum on cars. vw cars, stupid. who gives a rats ass about the spelling! THE WARRANTY ENDS AT 100K. if the belt was checked at 80k like it was supposed to be the tech? would have probably seen the wear and recommended a belt change and a tensioner. this ain't rocket science folks. sack up and pay up. it's a machine and they break. want a durable and fast car? get a NISSAN IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-09-2004 06:29 AM
jiblets,Google “interference engine”. IP: Logged |
wack_monkey Member
|
posted 03-09-2004 10:30 AM
google, "U SUK" have a nice day  ------------------ here comes the fiesta!!! IP: Logged |
Jiblets Member
|
posted 03-10-2004 08:53 PM
Well the engine shouldnt have started with out the timing belt being attached. My friend has a 92 Audi 100 and his car wouldnt even kick over without his timing belt. How do i know this? His snapped aswell. 7kardawg7, exactly what i said. IP: Logged |
Great Jetta Member
|
posted 03-12-2004 11:14 PM
UTR, As you so boldly point out:Hey class, Check this out: http://www.vw.com/SP/SchedMaint.html 2001 golf 1.8T has a 105k-mile timing belt. I guess VW is crap, if their car cannot meet the OFFICIAL 'factory' recommended service intervals. Crappy parts Crappy cars Crappy service It’s all right there in black and white on the official VWoA website, which corresponds directly with the owner’s manual. Again, please explain how these facts are fraud? Fraud, and the fraud is you, it also says "check" timing belt at 40 and 80K . Now oh brain child, why would you have to check it at 40 and 80, gee because it might not make it till 105k depending on a lot of things. Of course you left that little fact out as usual. You use "facts" as they suit you. If anyone goes 100k on a timing belt your asking for the inevitable, it's rubber, they break, they weather, they stretch even with a tensioner. Welcome to the real world. Oh yes, crappy parts? How about plastic coated cam gears with a metal chain, WOW that lasted maybe 50k or how about a fiber cam gear, or aluminum? How about 911 timing chain tensioners? Ah yes, vaunted Hondas, no timing belt change in the manual for years then massive timing belt problems, then two years later in the manual. Where the hell have you been over the years? Under rocks?
Yep 102k and a belt breaks, really crappy parts, NOT! Was the car maintained and checked properly? You don''t know, only what is posted, guess, guess, guess. And the poster a 2001 with 102k that's a lot of miles in a short time it spent soooooooooooo much time in the shop to get that many miles on it. Amazing!
IP: Logged |
JackIsBack Member
|
posted 03-13-2004 01:08 AM
Can the very wise timing belt people in this forum please tell me why VW has changed the intervals for timing belt replacement from year to year (on the TDI engine - slightly off topic, SORRY). Seems a little bit suspicious to me since the engine has not changed from the 2000 to 2003 models. Could it be a hard sell to tell people to replace the timing belt every 20,000 miles (that’s right) at a cost fast approaching $1000 (the timing belt for the TDI is well over double the price). All my gas savings just *poof* vanished. The 2000 and 2001 model years timing belt replacement at 40k, 60k, 80k, 100k miles (I guess they make the original factory installed one better) The 2002 model year is every 80, and the 2003 model year is every 100k – WOW that’s some discrepancy. source: http://www.vw.com/SP/SchedMaint.jsp
IP: Logged |
amayers Junior Member
|
posted 11-14-2004 11:31 AM
VW makes really neat products, but the information from VWOA (maintenance) is not terribly good or prudent. It is really ashame that this is the case. The whole 100K powertrain warranty was done to get beyond a perception of poor quality, brought on perhaps by bad technical data. To the technical wizards admonishing the owners who took the time to read the manual. Grow up little (and I do mean little) boys, you aren't the rocket scientists that you think you are.
Any part for any manufacturer should reasonably last WELL beyond the recommended service interval ... period ... that is if the manufacturer values customers. I have owned 6 or 7 hondas, timing belt intervals from 60-90K miles, I don't sweat if I am 5K over the interval, and have never heard of anyone (dozens) I recommended a honda to having a timing belt failure. I have heard of premature (near service interval) failures on a couple of Ford models, but timing belt failures in general are pretty rare.
I do agree that 105K is a lot to expect in a TB, but the German engineers that spec the belt should know how long it will last ... under a variety of conditions ... and it is not up to the consumer, who shouldn't know or care what a timing belt does, to second guess published maintnenance intervals.
VWOA needs to get a clue ... it's not enough to make innovative cars that are fun to drive, and then expect some adolescent minded or bleeding heart liberal cult following due to pretty slick marketing. I don't for a minute expect that the 10K oil change interval for my 2005 TDI is realistic, IF I plan to drive it for the 400-500K that it should reasonably run given a more realistic oil change interval. preface: I just bought a Jetta TDI wagon, and like it a lot. I have found one thing I really don't like however:
The VW 505 01 Oil Spec for this TDI motor, which in my manual says look on the website for oils meeting the spec, does not exist on the VW website, I was given the wrong list of oils, 501 02, when I emailed VWOA support, and finally the oil (obviously not manufactured by VW) is only available at the dealer under VW labeling.
IP: Logged |
KMW44 Member
|
posted 11-14-2004 07:48 PM
The belt is supposed to be checked every 40k anyways. If you took your vehicle to the dealership to do your 80k, its on the list of things to do. IP: Logged |
shaunmic Member
|
posted 12-19-2004 03:46 AM
do some homework on your cars, if they say check@40k you should probably replace it then I can see it now all you complaining about VW and how they build crap cars, probably still own it or bought another one. No,and i say NO company is going to build a piece of crap car on purpose. sure all models have some problems. Do you really think that they are that stupid,if they bulds crap nobody is going to buy another one (well except maybe you)IP: Logged |
huevon Member
|
posted 12-29-2004 04:19 PM
the timing belt is supposed to be changed at 70k...they say that the fuel filter is supposed to be lifetime at some dealerships but i change mine every 50k...preventive maint. is the key IP: Logged |
VW-Pro Member
|
posted 01-15-2005 09:56 PM
vw says to have the belt inspeced on you 40K maintence's (40k 80k....)------------------ NOT all VW suck!! IP: Logged |
novws Member
|
posted 01-16-2005 12:22 AM
I've always changed timing belts at 60 to 80,000 no matter what it said or did not say in the manual, if the 1.9 say 40,000 I'd be changing at the 30,000 service,a few hundred dollars is nothing whem compared to 1,000's in engine work.IP: Logged |
pm26 Member
|
posted 01-19-2005 10:30 PM
The reason why VW specifies 105K timing belt change interval is because many states require that no major maintenance be performed on a vehicle within first 100K miles. Timing belt replacement is considered major maintenance. If a manufacturer actually recommends replacement at 105K miles and the belt breaks before this milestone, then they should technically repair your engine for free becuase the belt should be designed to last at least 150K miles before breaking. However, what seems logical, is not always the case. I own a 95 Nissan pickup. The manufacturer recommends replacing the timing belt at 105K miles also. The engine is a V6 interference type engine (valves will strike the pistons if the timing belt breaks while the engine is running) and the truck has about 80K miles on it. I am ready to replace the belt at this point because Nissan told me that they would not fix my engine if the belt breaks before 105K miles. So VW is not the only company that will not help you past the warranty period. If you have a car with a non-interference engine, you can stretch the timing belt replacement mileage some, however, with an interference engine I would not go past 80K miles, irrespective of what the manufacturer recommends.
IP: Logged |
shaunmic Member
|
posted 03-11-2005 09:36 AM
the schedule sys to check at 40 and 80K, so to me depending on where you live and the enviroment you could be changing the belt at 40K miles. Check it and be safe, if you let it go 105K and it broke it's your own fault the maintenance schedule is a refrance only: if you live in a cold climate belts are prone to break and in a hot area they stretch... Vw belts are no better or worse than any other manufacturer, ther are probably ony a hand full of maker for all the beltsI also have to ask all the comlainersif you still own a VW IP: Logged |
pm26 Member
|
posted 03-12-2005 02:08 AM
Goodyear and Gates are two major timing belt manufacturers that I can think of.IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 03-14-2005 08:15 AM
Continental. (General Tire & Rubber)IP: Logged |
2001VWGTI Junior Member
|
posted 02-28-2006 08:34 PM
Timing belt went - need head jobMy 2001 GTI just blew its timing belt at 79K, maintainence schedule says to replace at 105K, the belt hit the valve, it's going to cost me over $3000. I had it checked at 40k, it died before hitting 80k. Source: http://www.bentleypublishers.com/product.htm?code=va45 and VW website We are not the only victims of VW timing belt, I'd say start a class action lawsuit against VW, it's their responsibility to recall defects!! I posted my class action lawsuit here: https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/vw IP: Logged |
pm26 Member
|
posted 03-01-2006 11:26 AM
If these timing belts are made by Continental, I am beginning to think that they are of substandard quality. I had a very bad experience with Continental tires, and if VW timing belts are made by the same company, well, they are probably not 105K mile belts, but 40K mile belts. A good timing belt should not break until at least 50% of its recommended life has been exceeded. In other words, a 50% positive safety margin. It looks like VW uses a safety margin of -30% on their timing belts. IP: Logged |
fkahn Junior Member
|
posted 03-13-2006 05:32 PM
quote: Originally posted by pm26: If these timing belts are made by Continental, I am beginning to think that they are of substandard quality. I had a very bad experience with Continental tires, and if VW timing belts are made by the same company, well, they are probably not 105K mile belts, but 40K mile belts. A good timing belt should not break until at least 50% of its recommended life has been exceeded. In other words, a 50% positive safety margin. It looks like VW uses a safety margin of -30% on their timing belts.
I agree with you about Continental's quality. I had the same experience with some of their tires too. They went south after only 25k miles with no front end or alignment problems Nevertheless, anybody who rolls the dice and does not replace a timing belt before 100K miles is just asking for trouble.
IP: Logged |
chrissev Junior Member
|
posted 04-01-2006 11:04 AM
vw interference engines have been breaking their timing belts and self destructing since they were originally introduced in the 1973 diesel golf. Since then vw has done little to improve either the quality of the timing belts that are used on these engines (they are still just plain rubber reinforced belts) nor to inform owners of their cars what can happen if the belt is not replaced and it breaks or jumps time. This has always been a major complaint I've had with Volkswagen. Ideally an interference engine should use a timing chain, they are much more reliable, last the life of the engine, never need to be replaced, and very rarely break or jump time.Even on their brand new TDI engines vw continues to use a rubber reinforced timing belt which, due to the complexity of the engine/pulley injection pump design, requires advanced mechanical skills to replace (or a $1000 visit to the dealer every 60,000km). It is high time that vw changed the design of their interference engines to use a timing chain. IP: Logged |
pm26 Member
|
posted 04-10-2006 10:03 AM
The ideal design for a diesel engine is a direct gear drive from the crankshaft to the camshaft and the diesel injection pump. I had a diesel vehicle like that - a 1982 Datsun diesel pickup with a 4 cylinder diesel. There was no timing belt or timing chain - but direct gear drive with three gears meshing together: crank gear, cam gear, and injection pump gear. Similar designs are used on large diesel engines as well. This design is pretty much bulletproof, unfortunately it is impractical with overhead cam designs because of greater distance between the camshaft and crankshaft. This is why older Mercedes OHC diesels use a timing chain. At least it is a chain, not a belt. I agree that timing chain is much less likely to fail than a belt. IP: Logged |
Up-The-River Member
|
posted 04-10-2006 04:06 PM
But watch out....those old MBs can run in reverse rotation!IP: Logged |
pm26 Member
|
posted 04-10-2006 11:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by Up-The-River: But watch out....those old MBs can run in reverse rotation!
This would mean that the crankshaft pulley would be turning counterclockwise as looking at the engine from the front. Speaking of Older Mercedes diesels, they are not nearly as maintenance free as some people think: mine requires valve adjustments every 15k miles. On the plus side, if you take care of them and maintain them, they will run for a long, long time. IP: Logged | |